Memorandum on United States Leadership in the Post-Soviet Era
To: President
William J. Clinton
CC: Albert A. Gore
From: Daniel J.
Lavigne, Secretary of State
Date: February 11,
1993
Subject: The
Strength of U.S. Engagement in Post-Soviet Era Europe
Context
In the past seven years the world has changed
drastically. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 Communism in Eastern
Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia has retreated, and newly independent
states are welcoming a new sense of freedom. With Russia a shell of its former
glory, it no longer has superpower status on the world stage. This leaves the
United States as the world’s last remaining superpower. This is dawn of
unipolar world led by the U.S. This puts us in a unique position to spread liberal
values and economic prosperity to the far reaches of the globe, while shaping
our national interest.
Task
Given the United States has a great responsibility to
reform the world in our interest we must work to engage with the global
community and not to retreat, despite the fear of the United States declining
stance in the world and talk of reducing the military budget by as much as
fifty percent. The goal is to seek out institutions in which the U.S. and
states in the post-Soviet world can mutually benefit from. This includes
Russia, our former adversary.
Solution
The recommendation is that this Administration continue
the same level of engagement as the before keeping up the momentum to reflect
the change that we are seeing in the world. The New World Order consist of the
United States engaging in limited warfare, a vast departure from the use of
proxies throughout much of the Cold War. Expanding NATO will bring a wider
sense of peace to Europe. Additionally, the use of soft power diplomacy is of
high priority. Countries in Eastern Europe are still in economic transition.
This provides an opportunity of the United States to extend a hand in the form
of foreign aid and economic expertise from leading economist, such as Jeffrey
Sachs.
Evidence
International
institutions such as the United Nations have been used to give the United
States permission for intervention. This was seen when the previous
Administration invaded Iraq on behalf of Kuwait. Regional security agreements
are also making advances, with former post-Soviet countries seeking to join the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the coming years. Not only is
expansion of NATO is required, but also the need to bring Eastern European
markets closer to the heart of Europe. Jeffrey Sachs has reformed many
economies, not only in Latin America, but has started in Eastern Europe as
well. He is currently aiding Russian President Boris Yeltsin bring down
inflation and fully restructure the economy by other means as well. It is
expected that he will have a similar degree of success like he had in Poland.
Failed Solutions
Two generations ago U.S. President Woodrow Wilson
advocated for greater U.S. engagement with the international community in the
wake of the First World War. He suggested that the United States join the
League of Nations, which would act a forum to address concerns in hopes that
would lead to lasting world peace. The failure of the U.S and this organization
to coordinate market conditions in the late 1920’s and the decade of the 1930’s
led to the German people feeling frustrated and without much hope. Adolf Hitler
preyed upon this lack of hope leading to the Nazi party and the Second World
War. Additionally, failure for the U.S. to engage may lead to ethnic conflicts
in the wake of the collapse of the post-Soviet security and economic framework
Implementation
The suggestion to reduce military spending should
not be up for consideration. Despite this era where immediate threats seem to
no longer exist, the United States must remain the dominant player. Old
philosophical ideas are shaping foreign policy in the modern age. Democratic
Peace theory is to be at the forefront of American political thought, as no two
democracies have ever gone to war with each other. By expanding democratic,
economic, and security arrangements, this goal will be achieved.
Summary
The United States should continue with the
previous Administration’s foreign policy by using international institutions to
promote liberal values. In the post-Soviet era the United States is the sole
superpower, which means it has vast amounts of responsibility for the
international community. Institutions will help bring post-Soviet states “into
the fold” so they may enjoy the same benefit to these institutions as well.
Economic engineering by leading economist will allow for the integration of
markets. The United States will also benefit from their democratic development
based on the idea of democratic peace theory.
Works Cited
Taber,
G. M. (1992). Rx for Russia: Shock therapy. Time,
139(4), 37.
US
Foreign Policy. (edited by Cox & Stokes) Chapter 5 - "America in the
1990s: searching for purpose."
Excellent job, Dan! This post was very thorough and concise. You really covered all bases. You did a wonderful job taking many of the concepts from class and incorporating them in your memo. Topics such as NATO, League of Nations, and soft power were clearly explained and addressed. The only recommendation I would give you is to expand more on implementation. What exact action should the U.S. take in terms of becoming the dominant player of the world? Well done!
ReplyDeleteDan,
ReplyDeleteI think you did really well. There are a few problems grammatically. My recommendation would be to proof read, I would add sentence variation in the first paragraph you say this a lot. You also have two different fonts, I don't know if that was the blog site. Other than some easy fixes like that I think you did a good job. There wasn't any fluff and you were pretty straight forward with each section. Good first memo!
Dan, great blog post. It was strait forward, definitive and to the point. I also like how you explained multiple foreign policy platforms. At times however, I was a bit confused on what the issue you were addressing was. Obviously in post Cold War Europe there are a multitude of issues, but I would agree with Rachel when she said your implementation could be expanded. I think this would have cleared up any confusion on what you were trying to accomplish. Also, the spacing/font varies through the paper.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi all,
ReplyDeleteI guess I will address some your points with a single comment box. 1) Grammarly may be a good app to invest in. 2) I don't know what to say about spacing/ fonts, but those are minor things. 3) Moving on the the more substantive stuff, I tried to address the changes going on in Eastern Europe/ Russia at the end of the Cold War with a single policy. 4) I agree that the implementation section could have been stronger. Thank you all. Criticism is good, because that is how we improve. cheers!
-Dan