Sunday, February 18, 2018

Memorandum on United States Leadership in the Post-Soviet Era

Memorandum on United States Leadership in the Post-Soviet Era

To: President William J. Clinton
CC: Albert A. Gore
From: Daniel J. Lavigne, Secretary of State
Date: February 11, 1993
Subject: The Strength of U.S. Engagement in Post-Soviet Era Europe

Context
In the past seven years the world has changed drastically. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 Communism in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia has retreated, and newly independent states are welcoming a new sense of freedom. With Russia a shell of its former glory, it no longer has superpower status on the world stage. This leaves the United States as the world’s last remaining superpower. This is dawn of unipolar world led by the U.S. This puts us in a unique position to spread liberal values and economic prosperity to the far reaches of the globe, while shaping our national interest.

Task
Given the United States has a great responsibility to reform the world in our interest we must work to engage with the global community and not to retreat, despite the fear of the United States declining stance in the world and talk of reducing the military budget by as much as fifty percent. The goal is to seek out institutions in which the U.S. and states in the post-Soviet world can mutually benefit from. This includes Russia, our former adversary.

Solution
The recommendation is that this Administration continue the same level of engagement as the before keeping up the momentum to reflect the change that we are seeing in the world. The New World Order consist of the United States engaging in limited warfare, a vast departure from the use of proxies throughout much of the Cold War. Expanding NATO will bring a wider sense of peace to Europe. Additionally, the use of soft power diplomacy is of high priority. Countries in Eastern Europe are still in economic transition. This provides an opportunity of the United States to extend a hand in the form of foreign aid and economic expertise from leading economist, such as Jeffrey Sachs.

Evidence
International institutions such as the United Nations have been used to give the United States permission for intervention. This was seen when the previous Administration invaded Iraq on behalf of Kuwait. Regional security agreements are also making advances, with former post-Soviet countries seeking to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the coming years. Not only is expansion of NATO is required, but also the need to bring Eastern European markets closer to the heart of Europe. Jeffrey Sachs has reformed many economies, not only in Latin America, but has started in Eastern Europe as well. He is currently aiding Russian President Boris Yeltsin bring down inflation and fully restructure the economy by other means as well. It is expected that he will have a similar degree of success like he had in Poland.

Failed Solutions
Two generations ago U.S. President Woodrow Wilson advocated for greater U.S. engagement with the international community in the wake of the First World War. He suggested that the United States join the League of Nations, which would act a forum to address concerns in hopes that would lead to lasting world peace. The failure of the U.S and this organization to coordinate market conditions in the late 1920’s and the decade of the 1930’s led to the German people feeling frustrated and without much hope. Adolf Hitler preyed upon this lack of hope leading to the Nazi party and the Second World War. Additionally, failure for the U.S. to engage may lead to ethnic conflicts in the wake of the collapse of the post-Soviet security and economic framework

Implementation
            The suggestion to reduce military spending should not be up for consideration. Despite this era where immediate threats seem to no longer exist, the United States must remain the dominant player. Old philosophical ideas are shaping foreign policy in the modern age. Democratic Peace theory is to be at the forefront of American political thought, as no two democracies have ever gone to war with each other. By expanding democratic, economic, and security arrangements, this goal will be achieved.

Summary
The United States should continue with the previous Administration’s foreign policy by using international institutions to promote liberal values. In the post-Soviet era the United States is the sole superpower, which means it has vast amounts of responsibility for the international community. Institutions will help bring post-Soviet states “into the fold” so they may enjoy the same benefit to these institutions as well. Economic engineering by leading economist will allow for the integration of markets. The United States will also benefit from their democratic development based on the idea of democratic peace theory. 



Works Cited
Taber, G. M. (1992). Rx for Russia: Shock therapy. Time, 139(4), 37.
US Foreign Policy. (edited by Cox & Stokes) Chapter 5 - "America in the 1990s: searching for purpose."

5 comments:

  1. Excellent job, Dan! This post was very thorough and concise. You really covered all bases. You did a wonderful job taking many of the concepts from class and incorporating them in your memo. Topics such as NATO, League of Nations, and soft power were clearly explained and addressed. The only recommendation I would give you is to expand more on implementation. What exact action should the U.S. take in terms of becoming the dominant player of the world? Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dan,
    I think you did really well. There are a few problems grammatically. My recommendation would be to proof read, I would add sentence variation in the first paragraph you say this a lot. You also have two different fonts, I don't know if that was the blog site. Other than some easy fixes like that I think you did a good job. There wasn't any fluff and you were pretty straight forward with each section. Good first memo!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dan, great blog post. It was strait forward, definitive and to the point. I also like how you explained multiple foreign policy platforms. At times however, I was a bit confused on what the issue you were addressing was. Obviously in post Cold War Europe there are a multitude of issues, but I would agree with Rachel when she said your implementation could be expanded. I think this would have cleared up any confusion on what you were trying to accomplish. Also, the spacing/font varies through the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi all,

    I guess I will address some your points with a single comment box. 1) Grammarly may be a good app to invest in. 2) I don't know what to say about spacing/ fonts, but those are minor things. 3) Moving on the the more substantive stuff, I tried to address the changes going on in Eastern Europe/ Russia at the end of the Cold War with a single policy. 4) I agree that the implementation section could have been stronger. Thank you all. Criticism is good, because that is how we improve. cheers!

    -Dan

    ReplyDelete

Paris Agreement

To: President Donald Trump CC: Vice President Michael Pence From: Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Brady Gambone ...