Memorandum on the Situation in Venezuela
To: President Donald J. Trump
CC: Michael R. Pence
From: Daniel J. Lavigne, Secretary of State
Date: March 30, 2018
Subject: The Situation in Venezuela
Context
In 1998 Hugo Chavez was
elected President of Venezuela, after a failed coup d’état earlier in the
decade. As a four-term president of Venezuela he implemented many social
programs encompassing food, healthcare, housing, and education. All were
designed to help the country’s poor. Many of these programs were financed
through oil revenues. In 2013 Nicolas Maduro was elected president by narrow
margins. He has continued the same economic policies as his predecessor,
despite lower government revenues from the fall in oil prices. This has led to
hyperinflation, shortages in food and medicine, and increased violence across
the country.
Task
The Trump Administration
should be tasked with helping the people of Venezuela in normalizing their
economy. It is in the best interest for the consumers of the country for the
reduction of inflation, which is currently eroding the value of their currency.
Inflation is making goods more expensive to purchase, lowering the standard of
living in many areas. The markets do not have staple goods available for sale
and lines que all over the country to obtain these goods. Basic medicine is not
available. The economic situation in the country is producing high levels of
violence, such as kidnapping, due to the lack of high paying jobs. Similar
things are occurring in medical facilities. Security forces are also
overwhelmed with the constant stream of protest.
Solution
To address the shortages
of needed goods in the country, there needs to be a shift in economic policy at
the national level. Inflation is eroding the purchasing power of the Peso,
leaving many without the means to purchase the necessary goods. Medical staff
are leaving their profession to find other work that has better pay. This
leaves many of the hospitals understaffed. Kidnapping has increased, and law
and order is faltering. The country is need of economic shock therapy. This
includes issuing a new currency, ending government price controls on many goods
and services, reducing government spending, and privatizing industry.
Reinstituting economic stability will help alleviate these secondary effects.
Evidence
Shock therapy is not a new economic restructuring
policy in the region. It has been tried in Chile, Argentina, and most notably
Bolivia. Shock therapy for Venezuela should be based on the Bolivian model as
the set of policies occurred within a democratic setting. According to former
president of Bolivia Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada in his interview for PBS’ Commanding Heights he saw the implementation
firsthand. He stated that this started with the “...famous decree, 21060, that
stopped hyperinflation in Bolivia [in] three weeks [covering] 220 articles”
(PBS). Leading Economist from the Kennedy School of Government, Jeffrey Sachs
suggested a policy outline on “.... what he felt should be done -- liberating
controls; controlling... fiscal variables; spending what you had; [and] not
spending what you didn't have” (PBS, 2002). He advocated for austerity
measures. Often the policy of shock therapy gets criticized in the country in
which it is implemented due to the forces in Washington. Bolivia is an example
where this did not occur. Sanchez de Lozada clarifies this detail stating, we
“...were totally alone, because the World Bank had closed its office, the
[Inter-] American Development Bank was still here, and the IMF had pulled out
its representative, and the American government and other friendly nations
wouldn't answer the telephone, so we had to do all this alone. We were
considered a basket case” (PBS, 2002). No one from the international arena had
the political will to help so Bolivia had to do this on their own. Domestically
Bolivia liberated all prices, unfroze payrolls, and slowly increased wages in
the public sector, including education, health, army, and police in accordance
with what they could offer with their tax-base.
Failed Solutions
Shock therapy must be
implemented swiftly and completely to work effectively. Shock therapy was
attempted in Russia in the early 1990’s where it did not achieve the desired
results. These type of programs, if not implemented fully, lead to greater
inequality between the rich and the poor. The oligarchs extracted resources
from the state, (a problem still visible today) while pensioners see their
Rubles evaporate in the inflation. In summary Jeffrey Hays provides three
reasons why it did not work in Russia: “1) inexperience of Russia in acting
under honest and civil ‘"capitalist rules of behavior"’; 2) lack of
consensus in Russia about how to approach the country’s future; 3) Russia's
massive size and the difficulty of making change in a place so vast” (Hays,
2008). Officials in Russia and the people had trouble understanding how western
markets functioned, and had difficulty implementing these ideas. The size of
the country also made this difficult.
Implementation
In May of this year
there will be presidential election in Venezuela. Depending on the result in
elections, and if they are accepted by Maduro, the country may descend into
further chaos. The United States should extend a hand and all available
resources to implement these much-needed economic reforms. This includes
sending our brightest academics and skilled policymakers to Caracas to work at
an official capacity to carry out these details. The long-term goal is to
stabilize the economy. It is our hope that the next President of Venezuela
looks favorably to the U.S. for trade and investment. This will be a
fundamental change of policy since the implementation of recent sanctions. At
the regional level this will demonstrate a sense of goodwill which has been
missing for over a decade, considering that U.S. interest have shifted to other
parts of the globe.
Summary
The people of Venezuela are suffering.
Violence has erupted in the streets due to the rapidly declined economic
situation caused by generous social spending and declining oil revenues. Many
essential goods are unavailable for purchase. To improve the situation in the
country, reform is needed. What is required is the use of shock therapy to
restart the economy encouraging the Government to bring spending to sustainable
levels, while reducing inflation. This will help normalize prices over the long
term. Additionally, these reforms need to be followed through, otherwise
Venezuela may end up like Russia, where high levels of corruption exist.
Works Cited
Pbs.org. (2002). Commanding
Heights : Shock Therapy | on PBS. [online] Available at:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/ufd_shocktherapy_full.html#gonzalodelozada
[Accessed 1 Apr. 2018].
Hays, J. (2008). SHOCK THERAPY
AND ECONOMIC POLICY UNDER YELTSIN | Facts and Details. [online]
Factsanddetails.com. Available at:
http://factsanddetails.com/russia/Economics_Business_Agriculture/sub9_7b/entry-5168.html
[Accessed 1 Apr. 2018].
Dan,
ReplyDeleteYou did a fantastic job explaining the issues and you wrote very nicely. You put in a lot of detail without the memo being full of fluff. Your memo was very insightful and fills in the reader in and keeps them engaged. I like how you put shock therapy in the failed solutions even though it is what you are pushing for. If you hadn't addressed the issues that shock therapy caused in Russia, than someone could have shot down the whole memo but you addressed it, explained why it didn't work in Russia and explained why the outcome would be different in Venezuela. Overall, great job!
Thank you so much!
DeleteDan, this is a really well written memo. I think you used outside sources along with the class discussion to supplement your policy effectively.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I have concerns with your implementation section. What if the Venezuelan government doesn't accept the United States help? Do we leave? Do we come back with troops? Also, how might the American public feel if we give food, medicine, and money to Venezuela, while some here lack those basic necessities? (Granted far fewer then in Venezuela.)
I agree that Venezuela is in trouble, and I think your proposal of shock therapy is exceptional. Overall, very good memo!
Hi Brady,
DeleteThank you for your comments.
My response to your "what if" questions would be to draft a new memo and move the content under the failed solutions section, citing this memo as evidence, advocating for a stronger position. The recipient is not obligated to act upon what is written in these memos. These are suggestions. Should the Venezuelan Government not be as responsive as we. the U.S., like, the next option may be to spin this as a humanitarian mission, perhaps under the UN Flag. The problems in Venezuela in my view are systemic, and require a lot more than a band aid.
Great work, Dan! I really like your perspective on this matter--you offer an option that I had not heard of before. You explained the concept really well and I loved that you used neighboring countries as success stories to shock therapy. I have to agree with Allison when she says that it was a nice touch to use an example of shock therapy as a failed solution. You spoke on why it failed in Russia but why it would flourish in Venezuela. I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on how the government would gain consensus in Venezuela for this shock therapy method. You said that that was one reason why it failed in Russia and I am curious to see how that mistake could be avoided in Venezuela. Awesome job!
ReplyDelete