Memorandum
On North Korean Nuclear Aggression
To:
President Trump
CC:
Vice President Pence
From:
Allison Cannon, Secretary of State
Date:
March 20, 2018
Subject:
The Nuclear Threat That is The Democratic People's Republic of North Korea
Context
America is facing an unprecedented threat from North Korea with its
development of intercontinental ballistic missiles. North Korea's blatant
aggression cannot be ignored, and economic action must be taken immediately.
War must be avoided at all costs and diplomacy must be the forefront of all
strategic operations, but America must never compromise with North Korea.
Task
In order to ensure long-lasting peace and prosperity not only for the American
people but every nation around the globe, it is necessary to make sure that Kim
Jong Un never launches a nuclear weapon. It is essential to denuclearize The
Democratic People's Republic of North Korea without causing already tense
relationships to be strained any further. The United States has many national
security threats, so it is essential to neutralize this one as quickly as
possible in order to focus on other vital issues.
Solution
Denuclearizing the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea will not be a
natural process and must be carefully thought out before any action is taken. A
military response would be devastating. There is no doubt that Kim Jong Un
would retaliate with all his military might if the United States attacked the
country. Of course, our military is far stronger and would obliterate the enemy
in a matter of days, but not before North Korea had the chance to bomb South
Korea or even send a nuclear missile our way. The only step forward is economic
sanctions. Diplomacy talks will lead nowhere as neither side is willing to
compromise, and in our case, rightfully so. Not only should we impose sanctions
on North Korea, but we should also impose severe sanctions on China as well.
China is the only country with some sway over what North Korea does and
therefore it should be doing everything in its power to remove the nuclear
weapons. Since they are not, it is necessary to impose the sanctions to send a
message that we are relentless on this subject and will take nothing less than
complete denuclearization.
Evidence
The United States has taken part in numerous arguably successful sanction
policies in the past such as the ones placed on Iran. Iran, wanting to enter
the global market finds commerce much more difficult when strapped with
sanctions. There have been some issues with whether or not Iran has followed
the rules of the Iran deal, but even so, the sanctions do have an impact on Iran's
wallet. The United States had used sanctions on countries that seem to be our
allies as well such as South Korea in 1975 when sanctions helped discourage
South Korea from acquiring a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. There is no
guarantee that sanctions will be effective in this situation but as of now, it
seems the most viable and peaceful option.
Failed Solutions
Military action is not the route to take. In the past, we have used military force
in similar situations, and it has backfired tremendously. Specifically
speaking, the war in Iraq was one of the worst mistakes in our country's
history. We invaded under the assumption that there were weapons of mass
destruction and eventually found nothing. Countless civilians and American
soldiers were brutally murdered, and this is a situation we must not repeat.
Invading North Korea would lead to possibly millions of deaths if nuclear war
ensues and it is not a risk the United States should be willing to take.
Implementation
Sanctions must immediately be placed on North Korean officials. Instead of
implementing widespread sanction that would hurt the already impoverished
people of North Korea and feed into North Korean propaganda, it would be much
more effective to target specific individuals. The regime does not care about
the state of its people so making the citizens' lives harder would accomplish
nothing. Economically hurting the officials might stir them to give in to our
demands or at the least be open to communications. Widespread sanctions, on the
other hand, would be better suited for China. China has the ability and often
the desire to keep its citizens from starving. Therefore, the burden of the
sanctions will fall on the government and China will not put up with these
sanctions for long until it comes to the table. We should quickly rescind the
sanctions if China agrees to help to denuclearize the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea.
Summary
In summary, it is of the utmost importance to denuclearize North Korea. Using
economic sanctions is the most peaceful way to coerce North Korea into giving
up its weapons. North Korea is a far too unpredictable enemy to possess such
power. Nuclear weapons could easily cause the destruction of humanity, and if
we allow other nations, primarily those hostile towards the United States to
gain the technology, we are that much closer to nuclear destruction. Even if
the hostility is not towards the United States, atomic war affects the entire
planet. No one wants to live in a world where 193 countries are all holding
their breath waiting for someone else to make a wrong move.
Works Cited
"2003
Invasion of Iraq." Wikipedia. March 22, 2018. Accessed March 22, 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq.
Taylor,
Adam. "13 times That Economic Sanctions Really Worked." The
Washington Post. April 28, 2014.
Accessed March 22, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/04/28/13-times-that- economic-sanctions-really-worked/?utm_term=.81e6dece0c16.
Hi Allison,
ReplyDeleteI totally understood where you were going with this Memo. In terms of "economic actions" these are sanctions, which you mention the term in later sections. Please carry this term throughout. With sanctions, who are carrying these out? U.S.? China? U.N.? Most of the time it is the U.N. Security Council who issues sanctions on a country for their actions, or lack of actions. I would have liked to see more specific Resolutions in here. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "America must not compromise" as diplomacy and negotiation are both acts of compromise. In terms of Iraq, yes it may have been a failure, but as Secretary of State I'm not to sure if they would be this critical of their previous foreign policy. Working with China is key to understanding North Korea. If the regime collapses they are facing massive refugee flows. Lastly, Wikipedia is great for background, but take a look at the sources down the page. The sources here may be more policy based, and would have added greatly. The examples you brought in with sanctions as case studies were key to demonstrating future action. Do not be afraid to explain future action based on what has been previously tried. Hope this helps.
-Dan
Hello Allison,
ReplyDeleteI agree with one of the core arguments of your memo: military actions must not and should not be taken. It is essential to stay away from violence and force. Although the United States may handle the brunt of military retaliation, other countries such as South Korea would not be able to do so and would suffer greatly. I do disagree that economic sanctions are the most peaceful and viable solution. It is frustrating to continuously seek the same channels but I do not think that the U.S. should completely disregard diplomatic negotiations. You bring up a good point that sanctions on North Korea could harm North Korean citizens. I'm curious what you had in mind in terms of economic sanctions to target the upper-class in North Korea; hearing your opinion of that would have been interesting! All in all, great work.
Allison,
ReplyDeleteI think you make it really clear what your policy is, and how one nations actions can impact another. It is a really good point. I somewhat agree with Rachel regarding the economic sanctions. I do think they are the most peaceful solution, but, there have been some kind of sanctions on NK for a long time, and they do not seem to be working all that well. Maybe singling out China specifically would make more sense? I know you wrote this right as Trump announced his potental meeting with Kim Jung Un, but I would be curious to hear your thoughts. Overall, nice job!